cfaed Publications
Quasi-Static Scheduling for Deterministic Timed Concurrent Models on Multi-Core Hardware
Reference
Shaokai Lin, Erling Jellum, Mirco Theile, Tassilo Tanneberger, Binqi Sun, Chadlia Jerad, Yimo Xu, Guangyu Feng, Magnus Mæhlum, Jian-Jia Chen, Martin Schoeberl, Linh Thi Xuan Phan, Jeronimo Castrillon, Sanjit A. Seshia, Edward A. Lee, "Quasi-Static Scheduling for Deterministic Timed Concurrent Models on Multi-Core Hardware", In ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems (TECS). Special issue, International Conference on Embedded Software (EMSOFT’25), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Sep 2025. [doi]
Abstract
To design performant, expressive, and reliable cyber-physical systems (CPSs), researchers extensively perform quasi-static scheduling for concurrent models of computation (MoCs) on multi-core hardware. However, these quasi-static scheduling approaches are developed independently for their corresponding MoCs, despite commonality in the approaches. To help generalize the use of quasi-static scheduling to new and emerging MoCs, this paper proposes a unified approach for a class of deterministic timed concurrent models (DTCMs), including prominent models such as synchronous dataflow (SDF), Boolean-controlled dataflow (BDF), scenario-aware dataflow (SADF), and Logical Execution Time (LET). In contrast to scheduling techniques tailored exclusively to specific MoCs, our unified approach leverages a common intermediate formalism called state space finite automata (SSFA), bridging the gap between high-level MoCs and executable schedules. Once identified as DTCMs, new MoCs can directly adopt SSFA-based scheduling, significantly easing adoption. We show that quasi-static schedules facilitated by SSFA are provably free from timing anomalies and enable straightforward worst-case makespan analysis. We demonstrate the approach using the reactor model—an emerging discrete-event MoC—programmed using the Lingua Franca (LF) language. Experiments show that quasi-statically scheduled LF programs exhibit lower runtime overhead compared to the dynamically scheduled LF programs, and that the analyzable worst-case makespans enable compile-time deadline checking.
Bibtex
author = {Lin, Shaokai and Jellum, Erling and Theile, Mirco and Tanneberger, Tassilo and Sun, Binqi and Jerad, Chadlia and Xu, Yimo and Feng, Guangyu and M\ae{}hlum, Magnus and Chen, Jian-Jia and Schoeberl, Martin and Phan, Linh Thi Xuan and Castrillon, Jeronimo and Seshia, Sanjit A. and Lee, Edward A.},
title = {Quasi-Static Scheduling for Deterministic Timed Concurrent Models on Multi-Core Hardware},
doi = {10.1145/3762653},
issn = {1539-9087},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3762653},
abstract = {To design performant, expressive, and reliable cyber-physical systems (CPSs), researchers extensively perform quasi-static scheduling for concurrent models of computation (MoCs) on multi-core hardware. However, these quasi-static scheduling approaches are developed independently for their corresponding MoCs, despite commonality in the approaches. To help generalize the use of quasi-static scheduling to new and emerging MoCs, this paper proposes a unified approach for a class of deterministic timed concurrent models (DTCMs), including prominent models such as synchronous dataflow (SDF), Boolean-controlled dataflow (BDF), scenario-aware dataflow (SADF), and Logical Execution Time (LET). In contrast to scheduling techniques tailored exclusively to specific MoCs, our unified approach leverages a common intermediate formalism called state space finite automata (SSFA), bridging the gap between high-level MoCs and executable schedules. Once identified as DTCMs, new MoCs can directly adopt SSFA-based scheduling, significantly easing adoption. We show that quasi-static schedules facilitated by SSFA are provably free from timing anomalies and enable straightforward worst-case makespan analysis. We demonstrate the approach using the reactor model—an emerging discrete-event MoC—programmed using the Lingua Franca (LF) language. Experiments show that quasi-statically scheduled LF programs exhibit lower runtime overhead compared to the dynamically scheduled LF programs, and that the analyzable worst-case makespans enable compile-time deadline checking.},
address = {New York, NY, USA},
journal = {ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems (TECS). Special issue, International Conference on Embedded Software (EMSOFT’25)},
location = {Taipei, Taiwan},
month = sep,
publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},
year = {2025},
}
Downloads
2510_Lin_EMSOFT [PDF]
Permalink
https://cfaed.tu-dresden.de/publications?pubId=3848